| Player ⇅ | Pos ⇅ | Matchup ⇅ | Dep ⇅ | Proj ⇅ | p10–p90 ⇅ | Att ⇅ | TD% ⇅ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mac Jones SF @ DAL | QB | SF vs DAL | 2 | 268.9 | 35.6 | ||
| Dak Prescott DAL vs SF | QB | DAL vs SF | 1 | 246.6 | 36.1 | 17% | |
| Brock Purdy CHART SF @ DAL | QB | SF vs DAL | 1 | 246.1 | 31.0 | 17% | |
| Deshaun Watson CLE vs HOU | QB | CLE vs HOU | 1 | 245.5 | 32.7 | 14% | |
| C.J. Stroud CHART HOU @ CLE | QB | HOU vs CLE | 1 | 243.2 | 31.6 | 10% | |
| Jameis Winston NYG vs WAS | QB | NYG vs WAS | 2 | 242.0 | 33.4 | 9% | |
| Lamar Jackson BAL vs LAC | QB | BAL vs LAC | 3 | 214.3 | 23.6 | 12% | |
| Davis Mills HOU @ CLE | QB | HOU vs CLE | 2 | 214.0 | 36.5 | 8% | |
| Justin Herbert LAC @ BAL | QB | LAC vs BAL | 1 | 207.7 | 31.4 | 32% | |
| Riley Leonard IND vs MIA | QB | IND vs MIA | 3 | 207.5 | 30.9 | 10% | |
| Jayden Daniels CHART WAS @ NYG | QB | WAS vs NYG | 1 | 203.2 | 28.7 | 16% | |
| Daniel Jones IND vs MIA | QB | IND vs MIA | 1 | 202.4 | 31.9 | 14% | |
| J.J. McCarthy CHART NYG vs WAS | QB | NYG vs WAS | 1 | 196.9 | 23.4 | 14% | |
| Malik Willis MIA @ IND | QB | MIA vs IND | 1 | 189.6 | 23.0 | 19% | |
| Athan Kaliakmanis CHART WAS @ NYG | QB | WAS vs NYG | 3 | 186.0 | 32.1 | 14% | |
| Shedeur Sanders CLE vs HOU | QB | CLE vs HOU | 2 | 175.0 | 26.7 | 7% | |
| Marcus Mariota WAS @ NYG | QB | WAS vs NYG | 2 | 169.8 | 23.8 | 9% | |
| Tyler Huntley BAL vs LAC | QB | BAL vs LAC | 1 | 163.9 | 24.5 | 13% | |
| Dillon Gabriel CLE vs HOU | QB | CLE vs HOU | 3 | 153.0 | 29.9 | 7% | |
| Anthony Richardson IND vs MIA | QB | IND vs MIA | 2 | 9.0 | 0.9 | 20% |
No market lines on this page, by construction. The saved line file carries no week, so pricing next week's projections against it would attach this week's numbers to them. Nothing here is a bet signal — it is where the model expects the workload to be before the market has an opinion.
No game line yet for ARI, ATL, BAL, BUF, CAR, CIN, CLE, DAL, DET, GB, HOU, IND, JAX, KC, LA, LAC, LV, MIA, MIN, NE, NO, NYG, NYJ, PIT, SEA, SF, TEN, WAS — the schedule carries no spread or total for those games, so their touchdown numbers are levelled to an average game environment (22.63 implied points) rather than to their own. Volume and yardage are unaffected; treat the TD% column for those teams as a placeholder.
Injury reports for this week are not published yet, so every projection here assumes availability. Why that matters
Projections only, not advice. How this works →