Player ⇅ Pos ⇅ Matchup ⇅ Per ⇅ Recv ⇅ TD ⇅ Rec ⇅ Rec yds ⇅ Rush yds ⇅ Pass yds ⇅ Best edge ⇅
Brock Purdy SF vs LV QB SF vs LV Q1 50% 0.053 — 95% — — 4.4 — 48% 62.8 — 2% —
Mac Jones SF vs LV QB SF vs LV Q1 50% — — — 1.2 — 81% 55.5 — 2% —
Kirk Cousins LV vs SF QB LV vs SF Q1 50% 0.015 — 99% — — 1.3 — 78% 51.8 — 3% —
C.J. Stroud HOU vs LAC QB HOU vs LAC Q1 55% 0.022 — 98% — — 3.4 — 57% 50.6 — 3% —
Davis Mills HOU vs LAC QB HOU vs LAC Q1 55% 0.017 — 98% 0.0 — 100% 0.0 — 100% 2.0 — 74% 46.5 — 3% —
Justin Herbert LAC vs HOU QB LAC vs HOU Q1 45% 0.054 — 95% 0.0 — 99% 0.1 — 99% 6.9 — 39% 45.4 — 4% —
Aidan O'Connell LV vs SF QB LV vs SF Q1 50% 0.016 — 98% 0.0 — 100% 0.0 — 100% 1.3 — 78% 29.8 — 8% —
George Kittle SF vs LV TE SF vs LV Q1 50% 0.120 — 89% 1.3 — 29% 16.4 — 30% 0.0 — 100% — —
Christian McCaffrey SF vs LV RB SF vs LV Q1 50% 0.148 — 86% 1.2 — 31% 9.9 — 34% 15.4 — 8% — —
Nico Collins HOU vs LAC WR HOU vs LAC Q1 55% 0.064 — 94% 1.0 — 38% 14.6 — 39% 0.5 — 95% — —
Brock Bowers LV vs SF TE LV vs SF Q1 50% 0.087 — 92% 1.3 — 29% 14.0 — 30% 0.0 — 100% — —
Mike Washington Jr. LV vs SF RB LV vs SF Q1 50% 0.031 — 97% 0.2 — 81% 1.5 — 83% 12.1 — 13% — —
Mike Evans SF vs LV WR SF vs LV Q1 50% 0.076 — 93% 0.8 — 44% 11.9 — 44% — — —
Woody Marks HOU vs LAC RB HOU vs LAC Q1 55% 0.086 — 92% 0.4 — 65% 3.4 — 69% 11.6 — 12% — —
Omarion Hampton LAC vs HOU RB LAC vs HOU Q1 45% 0.028 — 97% 0.4 — 70% 2.4 — 73% 10.7 — 15% — —
Tre Tucker LV vs SF WR LV vs SF Q1 50% 0.037 — 96% 0.7 — 50% 9.4 — 51% 0.2 — 97% — —
David Montgomery HOU vs LAC RB HOU vs LAC Q1 55% 0.066 — 94% 0.2 — 81% 1.7 — 82% 9.3 — 18% — —
Deebo Samuel Sr. SF vs LV WR SF vs LV Q1 50% 0.089 — 91% 0.7 — 48% 9.2 — 48% 2.4 — 70% — —
Kaelon Black SF vs LV RB SF vs LV Q1 50% 0.030 — 97% 0.2 — 80% 1.6 — 83% 8.4 — 22% — —
Kimani Vidal LAC vs HOU RB LAC vs HOU Q1 45% 0.043 — 96% 0.3 — 73% 2.5 — 76% 8.3 — 23% — —
Ladd McConkey LAC vs HOU WR LAC vs HOU Q1 45% 0.033 — 97% 0.6 — 54% 8.1 — 55% — — —
Jawhar Jordan HOU vs LAC RB HOU vs LAC Q1 55% 0.021 — 98% 0.2 — 81% 1.4 — 83% 8.1 — 26% — —
Michael Mayer LV vs SF TE LV vs SF Q1 50% 0.022 — 98% 0.8 — 44% 7.9 — 45% — — —
Dalton Schultz HOU vs LAC TE HOU vs LAC Q1 55% 0.038 — 96% 0.8 — 46% 7.9 — 46% — — —
Quentin Johnston LAC vs HOU WR LAC vs HOU Q1 45% 0.023 — 98% 0.6 — 56% 7.7 — 57% 0.4 — 95% — —
Tre Harris LAC vs HOU WR LAC vs HOU Q1 45% 0.015 — 99% 0.6 — 58% 6.7 — 59% 0.0 — 100% — —
Keaton Mitchell LAC vs HOU RB LAC vs HOU Q1 45% 0.014 — 99% 0.3 — 71% 2.5 — 75% 6.4 — 38% — —
Oronde Gadsden II LAC vs HOU TE LAC vs HOU Q1 45% 0.049 — 95% 0.6 — 57% 6.4 — 57% 0.0 — 99% — —
Ashton Jeanty LV vs SF RB LV vs SF Q1 50% 0.071 — 93% 0.8 — 44% 6.3 — 49% 6.1 — 31% — —
Xavier Hutchinson HOU vs LAC WR HOU vs LAC Q1 55% 0.017 — 98% 0.5 — 61% 6.2 — 61% 0.8 — 89% — —
Jaylin Noel HOU vs LAC WR HOU vs LAC Q1 55% 0.037 — 96% 0.5 — 64% 6.1 — 65% 0.6 — 92% — —
Brandon Aiyuk SF vs LV WR SF vs LV Q1 50% 0.030 — 97% 0.4 — 70% 5.5 — 71% — — —
Jalen Nailor LV vs SF WR LV vs SF Q1 50% 0.040 — 96% 0.4 — 67% 5.4 — 68% 0.0 — 100% — —
Kayshon Boutte HOU vs LAC WR HOU vs LAC Q1 55% 0.024 — 98% 0.4 — 69% 5.2 — 69% — — —
Charlie Kolar LAC vs HOU TE LAC vs HOU Q1 45% 0.016 — 98% 0.4 — 64% 5.1 — 65% — — —
Marvin Harrison Jr. HOU vs LAC WR HOU vs LAC Q1 55% 0.030 — 97% 0.3 — 72% 4.7 — 72% — — —
KeAndre Lambert-Smith LAC vs HOU WR LAC vs HOU Q1 45% 0.023 — 98% 0.4 — 69% 4.3 — 71% — — —
Theo Wease Jr. LAC vs HOU WR LAC vs HOU Q1 45% 0.018 — 98% 0.3 — 74% 4.2 — 75% — — —
Jordan Watkins SF vs LV WR SF vs LV Q1 50% — 0.3 — 75% 4.1 — 75% — — —
Cody White LV vs SF WR LV vs SF Q1 50% 0.024 — 98% 0.3 — 77% 3.8 — 77% — — —
DJ Uiagalelei LAC vs HOU QB LAC vs HOU Q1 45% 0.023 — 98% — — 3.7 — 56% — —
Jordan James SF vs LV RB SF vs LV Q1 50% 0.017 — 98% 0.1 — 88% 1.0 — 89% 3.6 — 50% — —
Jacob Cowing SF vs LV WR SF vs LV Q1 50% — 0.3 — 77% 3.4 — 78% 0.4 — 96% — —
Brandin Cooks SF vs LV WR SF vs LV Q1 50% 0.030 — 97% 0.3 — 75% 3.3 — 76% — — —
Kurtis Rourke SF vs LV QB SF vs LV Q1 50% 0.034 — 97% — — 3.3 — 60% — —
Foster Moreau HOU vs LAC TE HOU vs LAC Q1 55% 0.036 — 96% 0.3 — 76% 2.9 — 76% — — —
Jack Bech LV vs SF WR LV vs SF Q1 50% 0.020 — 98% 0.2 — 79% 2.8 — 79% — — —
Kyle Juszczyk SF vs LV FB SF vs LV Q1 50% 0.052 — 95% 0.3 — 73% 2.8 — 74% 0.0 — 100% — —
Roman Hemby LV vs SF RB LV vs SF Q1 50% 0.023 — 98% 0.2 — 84% 1.3 — 86% 2.5 — 62% — —
Fernando Mendoza LV vs SF QB LV vs SF Q1 50% 0.022 — 98% — — 2.5 — 68% — —
Christian Kirk SF vs LV WR SF vs LV Q1 50% 0.014 — 99% 0.2 — 85% 2.1 — 85% — — —
Brenen Thompson LAC vs HOU WR LAC vs HOU Q1 45% — 0.2 — 86% 1.9 — 86% — — —
Malik Benson LV vs SF WR LV vs SF Q1 50% 0.025 — 98% 0.2 — 85% 1.9 — 86% 0.1 — 99% — —
Dylan Laube LV vs SF RB LV vs SF Q1 50% — 0.1 — 87% 1.0 — 88% 1.8 — 69% — —
James Thompson SF vs LV WR SF vs LV Q1 50% 0.013 — 99% 0.1 — 87% 1.7 — 88% — — —
Deven Thompkins LV vs SF WR LV vs SF Q1 50% — 0.2 — 85% 1.5 — 87% 0.2 — 98% — —
Dont'e Thornton Jr. LV vs SF WR LV vs SF Q1 50% — 0.1 — 89% 1.5 — 90% — — —
Ian Thomas LV vs SF TE LV vs SF Q1 50% — 0.1 — 87% 1.3 — 87% — — —
Luke Farrell SF vs LV TE SF vs LV Q1 50% — 0.1 — 88% 1.2 — 88% — — —
Scott Matlock LAC vs HOU RB LAC vs HOU Q1 45% 0.014 — 99% 0.1 — 95% 0.4 — 96% 1.2 — 80% — —
Cade Stover HOU vs LAC TE HOU vs LAC Q1 55% 0.025 — 98% 0.1 — 88% 1.1 — 89% 0.5 — 88% — —
Dare Ogunbowale HOU vs LAC RB HOU vs LAC Q1 55% — 0.1 — 94% 0.5 — 95% 1.0 — 81% — —
Lewis Bond HOU vs LAC WR HOU vs LAC Q1 55% — 0.1 — 92% 1.0 — 93% — — —
Marlin Klein HOU vs LAC TE HOU vs LAC Q1 55% — 0.1 — 92% 1.0 — 92% — — —
Dareke Young LV vs SF WR LV vs SF Q1 50% — 0.1 — 94% 0.8 — 95% — — —
Brevin Jordan HOU vs LAC TE HOU vs LAC Q1 55% — 0.1 — 93% 0.8 — 94% — — —
Patrick Herbert LAC vs HOU TE LAC vs HOU Q1 45% — 0.1 — 93% 0.7 — 94% — — —
Chris Myarick LV vs SF TE LV vs SF Q1 50% — 0.1 — 94% 0.7 — 94% — — —
Derius Davis LAC vs HOU WR LAC vs HOU Q1 45% — 0.1 — 93% 0.7 — 94% 0.3 — 97% — —
Jack Stoll SF vs LV TE SF vs LV Q1 50% — 0.1 — 93% 0.7 — 93% — — —
Connor Heyward LV vs SF FB LV vs SF Q1 50% — 0.1 — 91% 0.6 — 92% 0.4 — 91% — —
Hayden Rucci LAC vs HOU TE LAC vs HOU Q1 45% — 0.1 — 95% 0.6 — 95% — — —
Brayden Willis SF vs LV TE SF vs LV Q1 50% — 0.0 — 96% 0.5 — 96% — — —

Projections only, not advice — prices move. How this works →

Updated Tue Nov 3, 6:05 AM ET · Next Wed Nov 4, 10:00 AM ET
GARBEDGE TIME
Reference
?  How It Works